890

Chargers Paying Price for A.J.’s Folly

Post image for Chargers Paying Price for A.J.’s Folly

by Craig on June 16, 2010

Razor in hand, his sink covered in his own blood, A.J. Smith looks up at the mirror and dabs his face with a towel.

He’s cut off his nose and now is wondering how his face looks.

There is plenty of blame to go around in the contract disputes between Vincent Jackson, Marcus McNeill and the San Diego Chargers.  Blame it on the uncapped year of the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement.  Blame it on two stars who are apparently willing to risk a year cut out of the prime of their career in order to seek a pay raise.  Blame it on the bad contracts handed out before, the numbers game, whatever you wish.

But the lion’s share has to rest at the feet of the intractable general manager whose hardball style has apparently deprived his team of two young All-Pros.

“We lost a couple of great players today, and it hurts,” A.J. told Kevin Acee yesterday.

Lost?  Were they in a car wreck?  Lost at sea?  Downed on the field of battle?

Nobody’s lost.  Marcus McNeill and Vincent Jackson can both be found today.  They are one phone call away.

And the pain (other than that gaping hole in A.J.’s face where his nose once was) is going to be felt by Chargers fans, and by the team’s All-Pro quarterback.

When Philip Rivers’ blind side goes unprotected next year, and some pass rusher comes off the corner to wipe him out, then you might really have a player who is “lost”.  And a season lost.  And a window of championship opportunity lost.

It didn’t have to be this way.  Certainly, the players could have caved.  They might have signed their tender offers.  Maybe they would have held out for a week of training camp, or the first preseason game, to make their point.  Maybe one of them would have held out for the entire preseason, or both.

All of the above outcomes are preferable to a 10-week regular season standoff, hardened hearts, locker room questions, and a GM who has again made himself a big part of the story.

There was no absolute need to cut the tender offers to McNeill and Jackson.  If the Chargers considered their 3+ million dollar offers to be fair, they could have left them on the table.  The internal pressure felt by young athletes in their prime to play and earn would have taken over eventually.

A.J. Smith doesn’t do the contract negotiating for the San Diego Chargers.  Ed McGuire does.  I think we all know why.  Smith is the poker player who shoves all in on every hand.

“In due time, Coach (Norv) Turner will name two new starters,” Smith told Acee, “We will rally as a team, compete and try to win as many games as we can.  It was a very unpleasant situation we all had to deal with.  It came to a conclusion today. We will now move forward and focus on the upcoming season.”

Does that sound like a negotiator to you?  Or that there is any chance to have a negotiation?

If your end goal was to retain the services of either Marcus McNeill or Vincent Jackson via long term contract, why would you embarrass them with an 80% reduction of your tender offer?  Why would you give them a deadline in the middle of June?  Why would you speak of them as if they were deceased when they didn’t go along with your plan?

Just like there was no need to cut their tender offers, there was no need to publicly declare them dead and gone.  Notice the players haven’t said anything.  They’ve let Acee do the talking for them, and A.J. has responded.  Now the onus is on Smith.  He’s turned a negotiation into a standoff.

How does it look to Philip Rivers when your stud left tackle, a man who should have been your lifelong teammate, is replaced by an aging Tra Thomas and an inexperienced Brandyn Dombrowski?  When your top target is replaced by Buster Davis?

When Chargers players look around their locker room and see Jyles Tucker and Luis Castillo with multi-year deals and two of their top performers on the outside fighting for dollars, how will it make them feel?

The Chargers aren’t the only team with unhappy players and restricted free agents who don’t want to sign their tenders.  Darrelle Revis wants a lot more money in New York with the Jets, Albert Haynesworth is talking holdout in Washington, and the list goes on.

Where the Chargers seem unique is in their truculence, their hard headed attitude which seems more intended to piss the players off then nudge them into your desired negotiating position.

Maybe this will all work out for Smith in the end.  Maybe the hardball moves will pay off, the players will cave and come back to the Chargers cowed, Smith will suspend them anyhow for insubordination, and then sign who he wants to sign at the price he desires.  It’s certainly a dangerous, dangerous gamble for a professional football player to give up a year in the prime of their career.  Maybe one or both will turn out to be bluffing.

But maybe not.  Maybe, on June 16th, we can already say that the Chargers Super Bowl dreams for 2010-2011 were squashed by a hardball negotiation that went way south.  And if that turned out to be the case, why should any of us be surprised?

In 2005, Antonio Gates was trying to get paid.  Antonio Gates, one of the nicest men you’ll ever meet, and a true teammate.  This is not a selfish man.  He signed in plenty of time to be ready for the season, but he missed an artificial A.J. deadline by a week.  Smith suspended him for the opener.  Wouldn’t budge.

Without his top target, Drew Brees missed four straight passes in the red zone and the Chargers lost to the Cowboys.  Set the tone for a 9-7 season that ended with Brees hurt and on his way out.

With A.J. Smith, it’s my way or the highway.  Too many guys, good guys, are ready to hit the highway.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Related Posts

  • Chargers = For profit business. The team aspects of a professional sports organization come second to this.
  • Cschlish
    Every great organization in the NFL handles their business exactly as the Chargers do! They draft well, especially at QB position, get production out of a players first contract and move them along except the truly special ones on and off the field, cut throat hardline negotiator's, get rid of veterans a year early instead of a year late, rarely sign high priced free agents, keep players "hungry" either with competition or with contract issues, ect. ect. ect. The most important thing they do though, is to create discipline & structure within the organization and are very consistent with it no matter who or how good the player is! Your giving "kids" millions of dollars. I've worked in a few unions as a union employee and the successful companies all operate this way and the companies that do not succeed and get taken advantage of by the union and workers are unfortunately the nice guys...The day the Chargers stray from these principals will be the day we go back to losing! It's sucks I know, but it has to be that way. I'm as big a VJ fan as their is in this world, but I do believe the Chargers consistent disciplined approach is the key to being a winning franchise for life!
  • GDNPB
    CE you are 100% right that leaving the 3.2 million on the table in hope that they will have a change of mind and sign so that they could field the best team possible would be the right thing to do.
    Even if Rivers get damaged in the games against AZ. or Oak early in the season their will be these AJ supporters in this town who's ideology will not allow them to see the facts and will always support AJ's hawkish "my way or the highway" style no matter how much it hurts the teams chances to win.
  • Obviously we're not privy to a lot of information, the most important of which is what has been discussed between AJ and the players/their agents.

    With McNeill, a deal absolutely should have been done by now. However, there is a ton of uncertainty coming up after this 2010 season. We have no idea if there actually will be a 2011 season, we don't know what the new CBA will look like, and we don't know what kind of salary cap rules will be in place. This has created a very unique situation that has everyone involved trying to hedge their bets. AJ and the Chargers don't want to dole out new contracts to these players only to have them not play for a full year in their prime, or they find they are above the new cap in 2011 (or 2012) and you have a new mess on your hands. There's a lot more going on here than, "AJ is a big meanie with a huge ego."

    VJax is apparently either overvaluing himself as an individual, or undervaluing the impact his off-the-field issues have on his job and his boss's perceptions of him as a person and player. Don't get me wrong, I love the guy as a receiver, he's a difference maker and an asset to this team. But he's just as responsible for not coming back to play. If everything comes out as most are expecting it, that he holds out 10 weeks, comes back, and is suspended for 4 games, then he's going to make play in all of TWO regular-season games. Way to be a team player there.

    Merriman has the most to lose by holding out, and the most to gain by playing. He's not been himself for 2 full seasons now and his stock is the lowest it's ever been. Now is not the time to be expecting or looking for a new contract, as it'll be valued based on his last full season of work, which was less than impressive. So he just needs to play another season, and if he shows flashes of his past greatness, then he has nothing to worry about. This of course is all predicated on there being a 2011 season.
  • "VJax is apparently either overvaluing himself as an individual, or undervaluing the impact his off-the-field issues have on his job and his boss's perceptions of him as a person and player."

    Definitely agree with the latter. VJ's comments on the radio, post J-E-T-S-debacle, show that he is fairly clueless about the impact and potential consequences of his behavior. How could he expect a long term contract when he keeps messing up and faces a possible 4 game suspension?
  • 619Sports
    Couldn't agree more with this comment. I still think the Chargers, strategically, would have been better served and would have retained the upper hand in negotiating by keeping the tender offers at their original level. There is a lot at play, and in many ways the Chargers are stuck in the middle and are wise to be cautious. But their aggressive-seeming posture with these players casts them in a different light.
  • I'm not sure I agree. I feel that at some point the Chargers have to say, "s*** or get off the pot." They can't just sit around and say, "well, whenever you're ready, come on back"; the players are either going to sign their tenders or they're not. What good is rewarding an individual who obviously doesn't have the team's best interests in mind in instances like these?

    Once it was clear they weren't going to sign, the Chargers gave them one last opportunity to sign their relatively-generous tenders with a final deadline. When the players allowed the deadline to lapse, with a very significant incentive for them to sign before the deadline, the Chargers knew they needed to prepare for a season without McNeill and VJax and move forward without them.
  • Dktrgonzo
    Firstly, do you have any sort of evidence that "good guys...are ready to hit the highway."? The Chargers and AJ Smith are doing nothing more than any other team in the league is doing. For example, the Patriots have reduced their tender (which is allowed under the CBA) to Logan Mankins, the Saints have two players and so on. Twelve in all. AJ is taking no more of a strong-arm tactic than any other team, they simply have stars they're taking the tactic on. Which, in a way, is AJ's fault for drafting players that perform well. Vincent Jackson, one of these "good guys" you're referring to is staring down the barrel of a 4 game suspension for multiple alcohol-related run ins with the law and neither you nor I have seen Marcus McNeill's doctor's report. If you were an employer and had an employee you weren't sure could control their drinking, no matter how good they performed, would you rush out and give them a big raise or would you take a wait and see? Gates decided to make a point in 2005 and so did AJ. Gates knew there was a deadline and that if he missed that deadline he would be suspended. He missed the deadline and AJ suspended him because no one player is bigger than the team. In this case, no two players are bigger than the team. Perhaps you should preface your work with a disclaimer that states "I just do not like AJ Smith" rather than your wordy and more dramatic description of someone cutting off their nose to spite their face.
  • 619Sports
    Not every team reduced the tender offers to their RFAs. Some did. You listed examples above. And as you said, the other players in question are not stars. Treating stars as grunts makes sense in a locker-room/trench warfare mentality, but not in a contract negotiation.

    I don't disagree with anyone that there are character questions surrounding Vincent Jackson which make his long term signing a question mark, but it's the Chargers tactics that I disagree with. The unnecessary (in my opinion) contentiousness and strong-arm tactics have forced these players into a stance which I don't agree with either, but I at least understand why they think they need to react the way they are.

    And it has nothing to do with liking or disliking A.J. Smith. I have no personal grudge for or against. I imagine my feelings about AJ are much like many other Chargers fans: great talent evaluator, shrewd drafter (who's made some mistakes), puts together a terrific roster...but I have questions about his people skills. Which I articulated above.
  • Cydjim
    Could have the Chargers stepped up some, I think so with McNeil. Now with Merriman, he needs to wait because you have no idea what you are bargaining for. And with VJ, great worker on the field but seriously annoying off of it. I would make him wait simply because it is the only thing I can do for being an idiot off the field. I would have done something with McNeil myself; but we have no idea what the owners or Ed Maguire or the doctors are thinking. AJ is the general out front, but there are people behind him as well
  • 619Sports
    There are multiple subjects at play here, of course. The strategic decision of which players to sign long-term and which players to let go are tied to the negotiating tactics. I agree with you that McNeill should have been the top priority, Merriman is wait and see (and probably see you later after the year's up), and VJ was the in-between candidate whose lapses cripple his brilliance on the field. I wish it had been handled differently but perhaps it will work out. That's the gamble both sides are taking on at this point.
  • Weimblue
    You've not offered a single legitimate example to back up your 'suppositions'. Using Gates situation as an example is pure BS. He knew the dates/times he needed to respond to and he did. McNeil and Jackson knew their dates as well and did NOTHING. You pay no attention to the fact that the Chargers offers were totally within the parameters of the rules as they are TODAY. Jackson and McNeil (and their agents) knew these conditions as well. I have no misgivings about the TEAM's offers to these two individuals. The offers were fair when you take the rules as they are right now into consideration. Somehow I feel like someone getting a pay increase that is 10 times (or 5 or 15, who cares?) what they made last year is not something to be considered an 'insult'. I personally have no problem with them being gone. I'm a team player, they are not. I don't want them on my team. The Pats and Colts don't seem to be in a hurry to sign Brady or Manning at the moment. Wonder why? I don't. It called playing the game within the rules as they are NOW. Kinda like what the Chargers FO is doing right now. If you are looking to place blame for the Chargers being in the situation they are currently in, look to the NFLPA. They negotiated the rules as they stand. Why don't you encourage Jackson and McNeil to sign their tenders and then file grievances with/against the NFLPA?
  • 619Sports
    Just because something is allowed within the rules doesn't mean it needs to take place. The Chargers elected to drop the tender offers to VJ and McNeill.

    Deadlines and ultimatums aren't good negotiating tactics, that's my point. You can say that you agree with setting those deadlines, that they're allowed, etc, and that's fine. I would have preferred to see Marcus McNeill signed to a long term contract and to have the negotiations stay as positive as possible.
  • hacksawisajoke
    V-Jax a good guy? what has he done to prove that? McN maybe but honestly nobody knows shit about this whole situation. For all we know McN neck is only good for another few years.
  • 619Sports
    A couple of commenters are assigning a lot of meaning to the final sentence of the column. I don't know that Vincent Jackson is a "good guy", although I find him personally to be a very pleasant and intelligent individual. However I don't think many would argue that the quality of the players at risk in this negotiation are poor. So perhaps I should have written "good players" instead of "good guys". Read it as such if it makes you feel better.

    As to McNeill's neck, along that train of thought, nobody's good for more than another few years, so why give a contract to anybody? Marcus has proven himself on the field and will be missed.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Latos, Cunningham Slam Blue Jays

Next post: You Surprised? Well, These Guys Aren’t